AFFIRM. NEJM 2002; 347(23): 1825.
Randomization: 7401 eligible, 4060 enrolled. 2027 in rate-control group, 2033 in rhythm-control group.
Baseline: Mean age 69.7y, 40% women, 11% ethnic minorities, 71% HTN, 38% CAD, 5% valvular disease, 23% CHF, 35% had first episode of afib, 90% had afib in last 6wks, 69% had afib > 2d.
Therapy:
Rate-control: Initial treatment was 49% digoxin, 47% beta-blockers, 30% diltiazem, 10% verapamil. 70% had used digoxin at least once. At five years 35% in sinus rhythm, 80% in afib had rate control, and 15% had crossover to rhythm-control. Continuous anticoagulation with goal INR 2-3.
Rhythm-control: Initial treatment was 33% digoxin, 22% beta-blockers, 38% amiodarone, & 31% sotalol. 63% had used amiodarone at least once. At five years, 63% were in sinus rhythm and 37.5% had crossover to rate-control. Anticoagulation could be stopped if NSR > 4 wks, preferably > 12 wks. Goal INR 2-3.
Primary Outcome: rate vs rhythm
Overall mortality: 25.9% vs 26.7%, ARR 0.8%, NNT 125, p = 0.08
Secondary Outcomes: rate vs rhythm
Composite death, disabling stroke, encephalopathy, bleed, arrest: 32.7 vs 32.0%, p = 0.33
Cardiac arrest: no difference
Encephalopathy: no difference
Ischemic stroke: 5.5 vs 7.1%, p = 0.79
Myocardial infarction: 4.9 vs 6.1%, p = 0.60
Pulmonary embolism: no difference
Adverse Events:
Hemorrhage not involving CNS: 7.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.44
Recent IC Attempts